Cardboard
Justice
The
trial continues in the killing of Gheorghe Ursu
Yesterday
another court hearing took place in the trial case of Gheorghe Ursu’s killing,
the dissident beaten to death by the political police of the Ceausescu
regime. At the previous hearing, the witnesses who testified seemed
to have forgotten their own recent statements made under oath, and
on this occasion denied everything on the spot. This time again there
were witnesses therefore who retracted what they had said before.
The most spectacular and, at the same time, hilarious case was that of
Militia’s (the regular police not the political one, called Securitate)
General Gheorghe Scarlat. In 1985, he was Chief of the Department
of Penal Investigations of Militia. Turned into a “honorable” policeman
after 1989, General Scarlat managed to regain the exact same high rank
and position as that he had occupied during the communist regime.
Moreover, in 1990, he lead an commission of inquiry entrusted with the
‘clarification’ of the circumstances of Gheorghe Ursu’s killing.
He himself confirmed this fact in front of a court in 1994. Yesterday
however, he did not remember anything…Neither about the inquiry, nor about
his previous declaration. Likewise proceeded two other witnesses,
Ion Munteanu and Gheorghe Manda. They changed their testimonies under pressure
from the indicted. Luckily, there have been also witnesses who maintained
their previously made statements, during the penal investigation.
Gheorghe Pascale, Cristian Martin and Ilie Harsu, stated that Gheorghe
Ursu was systematically tortured by the two informers introduced for this
purpose in his cell, Marian Clita and Radu Gheorghe (Gicutza), under order
from the Chief of the Jail and of Penal Investigations. These statements
can be easily corroborated now with those already existent in the penal
investigation dossier. Also, the testimony of another witness, Dan
Popa, was confirmed by which he had maintained that he reported the torture
Gheorghe Ursu was subjected to his superior, Shift Chief Stefan Burcea.
Burcea had told Popa to not get involved anymore in the case. Popa
underlined the fact as well that one of the indicted officers, Creanga
Mihail, was well aware of Ursu’s situation.
Another
witness, Florin Palamariu, confirmed that Clita Marian, Creanga’s henchman,
was an informer. Creanga was periodically calling Clita out of the
room, to inform him about Ursu.
Andrei
Ursu, the son of the slain dissident, declared in exclusivity for Romania
Libera (Free Romania, newspaper) that he intends to sue (take action
against) the witnesses who recanted their previous, under oath, testimonies.
Ion
Traian Stefan